
The Ethan Klein and Hasan Piker beef has blown up into a legal lawsuit involving several content creators who were involved with its aftermath.
Hasan and Ethan have been locked in an online feud for many months now, but the drama reached a fever pitch in February 2025 when Ethan Klein posted “Content Nuke,” a scathing, hour-long video accusing Hasan of hypocrisy, grifting, and turning serious global issues into content fodder for personal gain. The video currently sits at 3.5 million views after starting a chain of reaction streams by popular content creators including FĂ©lix “xQc” Lengyel, Zack “Asmongold” Hoyt, Denims, Fr0gan, and more.
Four months after dropping Content Nuke, Ethan Klein is now suing three such creators for allegedly benefiting from his original video.
Ethan Klein is filing a lawsuit against multiple streamers for alleged copyright infringement over their unlicensed rebroadcasts of his Content Nuke video.Â
In a 20-minute-long video, Ethan alleged how reaction content on YouTube has progressed to the point where creators often don’t add any value, but instead gain views by capitalizing on someone else’s hard work. To counter that, he explained how he created a video specifically designed to bait reaction streamers, expecting them to replay it on stream without adding meaningful commentary.
Ethan has now filed a complaint against Fr0gan, Denims, and Kaceytron. According to the complaint, moderators of the H3Snark subreddit heavily promoted Denims’ group viewing sessions as an alternative to the original video. The lawsuit alleges that the restream peaked at around 45,800 concurrent viewers, significantly higher than her usual average concurrent viewer counts.
Big streaming names such as xQc have also reacted to the same content, but according to Ethan, xQc “isn’t a malicious infringer.” Ethan claimed that the three creators he’s suing restreamed his content maliciously and violated the principles of fair use. While some accuse him of profiling his targets due to personal bias, Ethan has responded that the lawsuits are not targeted based on gender or political beliefs.
He also explained that had registered his video with the United States Library of Congress to be able to pursue statutory damages. According to the legal lawsuit, he is seeking up to $150,000 in statutory damages per infringement, along with legal fees.
“This lawsuit is about ending the practice of lazy reaction videos that copy entire copyrighted works and purposefully siphon views and revenue away from the original,” Ethan’s lawsuit reads. “Frogan’s acts of copyright infringement were done with actual or constructive knowledge… were willful, intentional, malicious and/or taken with reckless disregard.”
Klein also targeted Kaceytron, claiming she was under the influence for most of her time spend playing his video and didn’t know what was going on in the Content Nuke video while reacting to it.
While Fr0gan and Kaceytron have yet to address the lawsuit, Denims has started a gofundme to cover any legal fees associated with the complaint.
It remains to be seen how the lawsuit will proceed, considering fair use is a notoriously gray area. If the case proceeds to court, it could set a significant precedent for how reaction content is handled on platforms like YouTube and Twitch.
21+ and present in VA. Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER.